Formative Feedback RPO
There were a lot of areas in my research and its presentation that needed work, starting with restructuring the three pillars. Although what is bothering me the most is the research objective, that I have not figured out yet. But the research seems to have taken a good turn. I feel like I am able to identify the depth of each pillar.


The pre-mortem exercise
While I was focused a bit more on the dissertation, I was also worried about the outcome and the process leading to it. So first I did the pre-mortem activity:
I wanted to do Hardware, which is - exploring with Arduino. I had an image of a pop-up book in my mind. But when I was looking at the servo motors and the sensors it did bring up a question in my mind - “How am I gonna structure it to be in a book?” I know that I will find the answer as I experiment however something still didn’t fit and I was now suddenly not able to imagine a final outcome.
If my project fell apart what could be the causes:
- Lack of basic knowledge in Arduino
- Lack of planning
- Lack of experimenting before proceeding to build the final outcome
- Could not integrate physical computing with paper craft because did not consider certain factors like material volume against the volume of the arduino tools.
- Could turn out to be a really heavy book
- Did not explore more possibilities of integrating physical computing with paper craft
- Just jumped from one tutorials to another without bearing any basic knowledge of the tools used, hence could not respond well to any technical challenges I faced
- Lost patience :,)
After doing this activity, I was thinking that maybe I specifically decided what my final outcome could look like without exploring and experimenting first. And also to not be so stuck on a ‘totally non-digital’ outcome. Maybe I should open my mind about what my final outcome could look like and experiment more and will be able to figure things out as I progress.
The double diamond approach
Initially I started exploring with paper circuits, but I faced a lot of connectivity issues with it, which maybe could be fixed but I also want to explore with sensors to insert interactivity in my narratives. Which is why I wanted to use Arduino. First when I got confused with structuring my outcome to be a pop-up book, I thought I wanted to explore some other technology but I realised that arduino is one of the best tools to insert interactivity so I should maybe focus on exploring arduino.
So what I really need is to have a fixed technology to explore but to keep my mind open to different possibilities of the final outcome. So I planned my activities according to the double diamond:

Discover
Week | Activity |
---|---|
11 and 12 | Arduino
Paper craft
|
Define
Week | Activity |
---|---|
13 and 14 |
|
Develop
Week | Activity |
---|---|
15 and 16 |
|
Deliver
This section is to be planned once I have gotten through other sections. But for the final outcome I am imagining that it could be a blend of digital and non-digital, could still be a pop-up book but with maybe just 2-3 narratives or could be a series of outcomes converted into a mini-installation.
Feedback
It seems that I am overthinking a bit and I don’t have to completely think about the outcomes right now, nor do I have to make it so complicated. But I do need to start experimenting. So Andreas gave me two activities to do till thursday:
- Arduino, button, LED and a pop-up poster
- Arduino, button, poster, control animation in p5js (how three buttons can create animation in screen)
I have to use the tools mentioned above to make moving posters of the narratives I wish to portray via the artefact. If I think about making a book, it can get a bit complex for me so first I should start with a poster.
One thing I have decided is that it would be digital illustration printed on paper, and first I will identify how to simply explore the tools and then see how I can iterate.